The Mossrim Then And Now


Curiosity of

Spritzer- Sandhaus-Herzog- Speilman-Mesira

On May 6, 1997, the plaintiffs, a not-for-profit Corporation and Yaakov Spritzer, filed a complaint against seven named defendants consisting of 167 paragraphs extending over 50 pages and asserting eleven claims as follows:

Yaakov Spritzer – First Amended Verified Complaint a.k.a. Mesira (167 Paragraphs over 50 pages)

Yaakov Herzog Mesira

Yisroel Sandhaus Mesira

Joseph Spielman Mesira

This went on for several years until the judge dismissed the suit and had this to say in the verdict:

“To characterize the complaint as prolix, replete with hearsay and irrelevancies, would be charitable.

(Judge Glasser- Final Ruling Against Yankel Spritzer)

History Repeats- Fast Forward 2009:

The Hundred forty four million dollars Lawsuit against Shomrim By Paul Levi Huebner and Associates (Click Here to View)

Update: It has come WIS  attention (again curiosity of MM) that the Bais Din, Bais Yosef whom are supposed to be arbitrating the Din Torah between the directors if Machne Menachem (mainly Mendle & Meir Hershkop, S. Heber and Yosef Goldman) and Yankle the Ganev Spritzer have been delaying the process for a good couple of mouth now. A day after the Shomrim Six verdict the Bais Din informed the Directors of MM the reason for the delay. The reason they stated was that various parties (including of course Yankle Spritzer himself) had pumped the B.D. up with propaganda about the Hershkops. Pointing to the Shomrim Six case and stating “how can you have a Din Torah with these people, look there will be a trial and you will see that the Hershkops are a violent gang”.

The Bais Din waited to see the results of the case and only now are ready to proceed.  This case/Mesira/blood libel had nothing to do with what happened on December 29, 2007 in 749 Eastern Parkway. There were and still is many of an agenda. It’s what we will label (for the future post), as the ‘Bigger Picture‘.

Update Shomrim Six case: The prosecuting and Mesira of Shomrim is still going strong. This Mesira  and the people behind it are far from done. Until blood flows in our streets these Mossrim won’t stop.

May G-d protect his children from all evil.

WIS message to all those that volunteer in Shomrim or any other Chesed organization that are being prosecuted and Harassed by these same Mossrim. Continue doing good things and pay to heed to these stumbling blocks and G-d has he has always will watch over you. The community of Israel is behind you. The Mossrim may be winning (what they are winning they themselves don’t know, as long as your losings/suffering they are happy, that just how evil is) many battles but they will loss the war, for good will always prevail. A little light pushes away a lot of darkness.

10 Responses to “The Mossrim Then And Now”

  1. john doe Says:

    It’s one thing for these non-believer mossrim to masser away, destroying peoples lives and livelihood, but for WIS to expose these evil theiving, collaborating,conspiring stinking garbage mossrim for what they really are, the scum of the earth……I find abhorent, I mean these poor poor “victims” why can’t you let shit be shit, not doing anything but sitting there while their smell spreads out causing others to cover their mouths and hold their noses and just put up with the awfulness, why does Wis not cover it’s mouth and hold their noses? why does WIS have to expose these shits? why doesn’t Wis puts it’s hands up and surrender like the rest of crown heights? The rest of us already gave up 770, joined forces with the police department or made deals with the police department to prosecute other Jewish residents, we use chanina sperlins political connections to get jews locked up, and we give millions of dollars to a messianist groups to terrorize those who don’t think like us.
    plus best of all we can even get the DA’s office to spew our filth and proganda in leaga open court and if you listened to the right words and ignored the rest they sometimes even sounded legitimate.
    I wrote this from the bottom of my heart to HELP you guys, despite what i wrote above which might sound like I’ve taken sides….and mabey even assist the messiros… assured it’s for you own good.

  2. machanemenachem Says:

    First of, thanks for posting this.

    “To characterize the complaint as prolix, replete with hearsay and irrelevancies, would be charitable”.

    Anybody who actually came down to court to see the truth for himself would come to this very same conclusion about the Shomrim Six case.

    The lies and venom being displayed was…well… how can I say it better then…“To characterize the complaint as prolix, replete with hearsay and irrelevancies, would be charitable”.

  3. Don't Forget Says:

    It’s all the same people doing the same messira, read Spritzers motions and the motions coming out now. The same train of thought.

    The Community Gets Subpoenaed:

    Click to access the-community-gets-subpoenaed.pdf

    Subpoena Rabbi Bogomilsky- Gemach:

    Click to access subpoena-rabbi-bogomilsky-gemach.pdf

    Gmach, Local Business Owners Subpoenaed by ‘New Vaad’:

  4. antimesira Says:

    I want to know who put political presser on Detective Duffy to arrest the Shomrim Six in the first place. Who did Chanina put to work?

    There was several years ago a story with the machlokes box in 770 which was taking down by the Hershkops (it ended up being theirs to begin with, belonging to MM—for a different time), The Hershkops were also arrested and Chanina Sperlins name was all over. They also then went through a whole court preceding. Somebody (obviously chanina0 put presser to get them arrested and then tried to have them prosecuted with possible jail time. All for a stupid worth less box. But as we are slowly learning it has nothing to do with a box or 749 etc…

    Find out who Chanina is using to get these arrest and prosecutions made and you break them from the top.
    Chanina Sperlin and his gang don’t represent our community, they have no rights to use our politicians whom we vote in to have our own people arrested and prosecuted.

    Chanina is said to have been visiting the DAs office before and during the Shomrim Six case to discuss what to do. At NO point did chanina reach out to the Shomrim to see how he can help, because thats NOT what he intended to do. I also want to know how much Dov Hikind had to do with this.

    I’m told by somebody who was by the Din Torah with the Rabbonim that Eli Poltorak the Mossier tried to make a case against the Hershkops by saying that they killed Marlow.

    Whats going on here? Why are these people walking out of our Mikvas alive? Why are they still being counted in our Minyanim? How can you walk pass one of these Mossrim and not spit (do it on the floor or else you WILL get arrested).?

    Next time you see them in shul confront them with these questions and demand answers. Don’t let them wave you off, intimidate and threaten you, this is you community, this is your home and they are intruding!

  5. emes Says:

    “Until blood flows in our streets these Mossrim won’t stop”.

    blood is already spilling in our streets. Messira of six innocent members of Anash is blood spilling. And still the Mossrim don’t stop. They have lost focus, assuming they ever had any. Their hate, envy and jealousy has driven them mad.
    They want to kill for the sake of killing, they want to hurt just for the sake of hurting. Ask them what they want; why they are doing this evil, they can’t and won’t give you a straight answer.

    Like a chicken without a head the mossrim run in all direction giving the allusion that they are more alive then dead.

    Everybody as individuals and as groups, have to ask themselves what are we doing to stop all this! If we want a future for our children, we better start taking proper action.
    One very easy thing everybody can do and implement is, don’t justify or excuse Messira and don’t let anybody else do it . Simply protest it.

  6. Truth and Justice Says:


  7. "according to the attribute of Truth unto Yaakov" Says:

    Short Version of Judge Glasser Final Verdict Against Yaakov Spritzer

    On May 6, 1997, the plaintiffs, a not-for-profit Corporation and Yaakov Spritzer, filed a complaint against seven named defendants consisting of 167 paragraphs extending over 50 pages and asserting eleven claims as follows:
    I) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1962(b);
    II) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d);
    III) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c);
    IV) RICO, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d);
    V) Tortuous Interference with Contractual Relations;
    VI) Fraud;
    VII) Conversion;
    VIII) Unfair Competition;
    IX) Breach of Fiduciary Duty;
    X) Assault;
    XI) Intentional damages to property.
    To characterize the complaint as prolix, replete with hearsay and irrelevancies, would be charitable.

    Plaintiff Spritzer was then called as a witness.
    His testimony is revealing in several respects. A careful and critical reading of it corroborated in eloquent detail the testimony of Shmuel and Mendel to the effect that Spritzer arrogated to himself the management of the Corporation. His direct testimony is consistent with the testimony of the prior three defendants…

    Most revealing, if not disturbing, was the testimony elicited from Spritzer upon cross- examination,….

    A careful examination of the returns for the years 1996-1998 give rise to questions to which answers that were less than satisfactory were offered by Spritzer.

    As has already been indicated, the proceeding was stayed from the conclusion of the testimony on October 31st, 2001, until May 13th, 2002, when the stay required by the filing of the bankruptcy petition was lifted and the direct testimony of Spritzer was resumed.
    Returning to the “Miscellaneous Statements”…

    On Schedule D, Spritzer is listed as a secured creditor in the amount of $1,131,675, which is $131,675 in excess of the mortgage he holds for one million dollars and he surmised that the excess must be an unsecured loan. One can’t help but conclude upon reading his testimony about the schedules submitted to the Bankruptcy Court that the information they contain is of questionable accuracy and the record of monies received and monies disbursed represent a haphazard hodgepodge of speculation.

    The conclusion that is compelled by his testimony is that the affairs of the Corporation were conducted by Spritzer as though it was his personal fiefdom with occasional allusions to board approval at meetings which are nowhere documented and by resolutions which were adopted and action taken only because Spritzer divines that they were.

    The vigorous assertion by Spritzer that Goldman, Heber and Mendel breached a fiduciary duty they owed Machne Menachem by a fleeting involvement in Ohr Menachem upon which they embarked to provide a summer camp experience for some children of Crown Heights who would not otherwise have had it pales into insignificance when compared with the total disregard for the obligation of a director with which this record of self-dealing and financial legerdemain reeks.

    Throughout his testimony, Spritzer asserted that meetings were held by him and Schreiber or by him, Schreiber and Spalter, at which corporate action was approved and yet neither Schreiber nor Spalter were called by him in support of those assertions.

    The summary of the testimony as discussed above would be correctly interpreted by the reader as conveying an unequivocal skepticism of Spritzer’s testimony regarding prior approval and authorization of his virtually unilateral action on behalf of the camp and the Corporation.

    I have previously alluded to the comparative breaches of fiduciary duty by Spritzer which, at the very least, makes his airing of them noisome.

    The evidence established convincingly for this Court that what is alleged to be their abandonment was, instead, what I have analogized to be their constructive eviction by Spritzer.

    The foregoing findings of fact drive the Court to conclude that Joseph Goldman, Mendel Hershkop and Shmuel Heber are still, as a matter of law, directors of Machne Menachem, Inc.

    The foregoing constitutes the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law. The Court has considered the arguments advanced in the brief of the plaintiff Corporation which requires no discussion by the Court in addition to what has been written and which, the Court, in any event, finds unpersuasive.

    I could just really bold the whole verdict. Those who are truly intrested in the truth the whole truth and nothing put the truth will take the time to read it. Everybody else, all the trouble makers, who cares what you have to say, keep crying, the truth hurts.

  8. Mendy K. Says:

    I like the fact that you bring actual facts and evidence, unlike other that talk about the prove they have and will one day show it.
    There is nothing like hard evidence. If you say there is documents, show them. If you say theres a video, show them etc…

    So far WIS had delivered on all it’s promises of showing prove.

  9. MM Says:

    Spritzer is a Ganev and lier.

    The Brothers Hershkops and Spritzer,. Machne Menachem Din Torah. June, 13th, 1996. 27 Sivon. Spritzer states: “WE HAVE A POLICY THAT CHILDREN OF VAAD (BOARD) MEMBERS CAN NOT GET PAID” (Min: 37:58-39:25). Does he keep to his own words? Find out here.

  10. spritzer-has-his-own-sister-arrested Says:

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: