Spritzer loses appeal:
Spritzers Appeal: Pages 1-11 ——- Pages 12-22
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the orders of the Bankruptcy Court dated March 4, 2010 (D.1.838) and March 31, 2009 (D.1.825) are AFFIRMED. Signed by Honorable A. Richard Caputo on 2/18/11.
Spritzer must return $1.3 million that he stole from Machne Menachem.
The following issues have to be dealt with:
1. Spritzer illegal activities throughout all these years.
2. Paying for all the damage he caused good families, by dragging them to Federal Court and bringing a Blood Libel (RICO) against them.
First loss for Yankle the Ganev Spritzer:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Judge Glasser Final Ruling Against Spritzer – Finding of Facts (Click Here)
Second loss for Yankle the Ganev Spritzer:
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Judge Thomas Final Ruling Against Spritzer – Finding of Facts (Click Here)
Also See:
Parshas Machne Menachem
Yaakov Spritzer Initial Mesira
Spritzer: This case is not about a Camp (Coming Up… WIS will have a post dedicated in explaining what the case was really about…).
How Did Spritzer Get Hold Of The Camp Grounds?
Din Torah: Past, Present and Future. It’s been over three years since Yaakov Spritzer was called for a Din Torah and still has not shown any sign of cooperation. Din Torah Update.
Coming Up… The Connection: Spritzer, Crown Heights Jewish Community Council Inc. and the Crown Heights Beth Din.
CHLEAKS 
February 24, 2011 at 7:26 pm |
22. It is clear that this Rico Case can harm many in the community, yet, no one as stood up to stop Spritzer and Schrieber in their malicious act. Moreover, many activists claim that Spritzer and Schrieber are doing these acts under the banner of “Kovod Ha’Rabbonim”!!
23. In the proceeding days, if Chas V’shalom it will not be withdrawn from the court system, the process of discovery will progress. As a husband and father I will have to do all in my power to defend myself. I do not want you to see this as a threat, Chas V’shalom, however, any one with minimal understanding can and must look forth and foresee the tragic happenings. In his affidavits, Mr. Spritzer, stated many claims which he will have to prove.
a) The courts will force him to disclose all his money dealings.
b) Money laundering is no secret in Mr. Spritzer’s dealings…
c) Imagine the misfortune that will occur to our whole community. That who understands, understands…
24. Mr. Spritzer and Schreiber’s court case is based on the Rabbonim. What will happen when the Courts will call on the Beis Din to testify whether his claims are true or false?? The Judiciary process will surely call on anyone that is mentioned in the affidavits.
25. I only presented two (#23 & #24) harmful points that the court case will cause and unless they remove the case this will continue to cause to the Crown Heights Community much harm.
26. I would like to reiterate that personally I am not afraid to stand witness and give my testimony. We as defendants are acting pro-se. This decision was made when we decided that the monies spent on lawyers can be better spent by helping and doing more good deeds in our community. I’yh when this court case will finally be over and we will receive our proper compensation from Mr. Spritzer and Mr. Schreiber, we will use the money to continue building and expanding our good work.
From:The Facts of the Matter
February 25, 2011 at 6:10 am |
In all these cases it was Spritzer that went to court. It was Spritzer that took others to court and now he avoids a Din Torah.
February 25, 2011 at 7:42 am |
the process of discovery will progress
the process of discovery will progress
the process of discovery will progress
the process of discovery will progress
Until we get to the bottom of it all!
February 25, 2011 at 1:21 pm |
Can you please post the memorandum of Feb 18 11
Thanks
February 25, 2011 at 1:37 pm |
Please send it to WIS,
whoisshmira@gmail.com,
WIS does not have it.
Before sending, you can write a comment, on what is being discussed there.